The insult against women continues as USA Today chooses to honor a man as one of their “women of the year.” This time, biological male, state representative Leigh Finke who “transitioned” in 2017 made the short list of so-called heroic women. Finke was only elected last November, but has been described as an activist for BLM and LGBTQ causes. 

 Alongside him were actual women such as Michelle Obama, and astronaut Colonel Nicole Mann. 

The intentional destruction and erasure of women is nothing new in this country. In 2015 Caitlyn (Bruce) Jenner was named Woman of the Year by Glamour Magazine. Leah Thomas destroyed female competitors to become the first transgender NCAA champion in division 1 history and was later nominated for NCAA “Woman of the Year” award. Earlier this year Jill Biden presented a man, Alba Rueda, with an award for International Women’s Day. Now newly elected lawmakers are eligible to be honored among women, even though they are men. 

Legitimate women across the country are being forced to watch what is essentially a public humiliation ritual. So-called “feminists” have created an unholy marriage with the radical transgender activists and leave real women in their wake of destruction. Young women work their entire lives to achieve success in sports, academia, or philanthropic ventures just to have a man dress up like an insulting caricature of what he thinks a woman is, and steal their awards. 

“A Drag Queen Christmas” hosted by famous “drag queen” Nina West is scheduled for Wednesday December 21st in Chesterfield MO. Originally this event was advertised as an ALL AGES drag queen event which would allow children to be present. That was until the people of Missouri pushed back and established the blueprint for defeating this obscene child endangerment

The venue hosting the event, “The Factory”, uploaded to their website an event description with the warning “PLEASE NOTE THERE WILL BE ADULT CONTENT AND LANGUAGE AT THIS EVENT.” Yet the age restriction for the event said “ALL AGES.” 

This drag queen performance in Missouri is one stop on a national tour including 36 different locations. Previous shows on the tour contained images and scenes unfit for children including simulated sexual acts, partial nudity, and adult themes with children present.  Federal, State, and Local laws in Missouri make exposing children to such material criminal. Specifically Chesterfield City Code Section 210.1700, Missouri Revised Code 566.083, and 18 U.S.C. § 1470 federally.  

Citizens in the show me state took action upon receiving news that this tour would be coming to town and successfully pressured the venue to change the event to 18+ only. First, news of the event was spread throughout grassroots groups of concerned parents, patriots, and community leaders alerting everyone of the situation. Shortly after the news was announced people began to organize protests at the venue. Then residents began to contact their elected officials. 

Missouri state Senator Bill Eigel then contacted the Missouri State Highway Patrol as well as the local Chesterfield Police Department informing them of the event and the laws protecting children. Local conservative talk radio hosts on The Real Talk Radio Network 93.3FM in STL encouraged listeners to call the venue as well as law enforcement and urged them to cancel the event. Public pressure grew to the point that even the venue’s facebook page saw droves of 1 star negative reviews for hosting an event that would endanger children. 

Citizens of Missouri made it clear that they would not accept the corruption of their youth. The Missouri blueprint is now proven successful and should be used wherever possible to protect children. Spread the news, get conservative legislators involved, contact law enforcement and make them aware of the potential danger to children, call/email the venue, and if necessary leave negative online reviews of the venue to make it clear that hosting these events is bad for business. Most States and localities have laws protecting children, in addition to federal laws which prohibit showing children obscene or pornagraphic material. 

Good in Theory

Conversation surrounding the death penalty has recently resurfaced in the mainstream after President Donald Trump advocated for the death penalty for drug dealers. Some supporters love the idea, citing the statistic that drug dealers kill on average 500 people in their lifetimes. Others are strongly opposed to the government having the authority to end someone's life. 

Ever since the beginning of time the death penalty has been used to punish the worst criminals in society. The first established laws regarding the death penalty date back to the Eight Century B.C and the code of Hammurabi. The death penalty can also be seen many times thoughout the Bible in the Old Testament and is mentioned in the United States Constitution's 5th Amendment which says "No person shall: be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." In order to completely do away with the death penalty we would likely need a constitutional amendment expressly forbiding it, because it is defacto mentioned in the 5th Amendment. 

On a personal level I agree that there are crimes so evil and so heinous that the perpetrator should be killed for their actions. Pedophiles, mass murderers, and people of that ilk should never waste another breath of perfectly good oxygen. If someone was to break into my home with the intent to do me or a family member harm there would be a swift on sight execution of the death penalty. Putting these prisoners in jail for life without parole (LWOP) creates an unessecary burden on the tax payer causing us to pay to house and feed the most vile demented people in our society. Many statistics point out that the current method of execution actually costs more than an LWOP sentence. As a result multiple states have begun to adopt different execution methods that cost significantly less nullifying that criticism. 

The death penalty works. There are no two ways about it. Someone will never commit another crime if they are dead. Pedophiles and mass murderers will never have the chance to harm anyone again from 6 feet under. It is an undeniable crime deturance, and highly effective. So in theory, I do agree with the idea of a death penalty for people who are proven guilty of unthinkable evils. 

Terrible in Practice

Government can not be trusted to do anything right. Although the death penalty makes sense on paper the primary "x" factor will always be government's execution of it. We are imperfect people capable of making mistakes. I would rather allow a mass murderer to live than send one innocent man to his death. Our natural imperfection and ability to get things wrong has resulted in countless innocent people being killed for crimes they never committed all throughout history. 

We could look back in American history to the days of the wild west and find potentially hundreds of examples of people who were framed or wrongly convicted and hanged. Unfortunately that won't be necessary. 

Before the days of DNA evidence our legal system viewed eyewitness testimony as the highest caliber of evidence. Everything changed however when DNA evidence was discovered. This led to the reexamination of thousands of convictions. As of 2011 there were over 273 people including 17 death row inmates that were exonerated as a result of DNA testing. That means that our system has gotten it so wrong that we had wrongly sentenced 17 innocent people to death row and would have executed them had it not been for DNA evidence saving their lives. Who knows how many innocent people were wrongfully taken from their families and put to death by the state? 

Even now, with the presence of DNA evidence I do not trust our government to get it right 100% of the time. Because of that I can not support the death penalty. Again I say, I would rather let a mass murderer go than send an innocent man to death.